‘The Legend of Tarzan’ leaves you hanging on the vine!
They have been trying to make a decent Tarzan movies for years. Since 1918 there have been 48 attempts to bring the jungle hero to film, the last three were direct to video Disney animation films. The last time the ‘Lord of the Jungle’ was adapted for live action was in 1998 when teen heart throb Casper Van Dien starred in ‘Tarzan and the Lost City’. Don’t remember it? Don’t feel bad, neither does most of the movie going public (except for me and I am still having nightmares!).
Director David Yates (best known for his Harry Potter films) announced his own Tarzan project in late 2014 and ‘The Legend of Tarzan’, nearly 3 years later is what he has to show for his efforts. With weak writing, even weaker acting and two leading characters who have absolutely no chemistry, this latest version of Tarzan is just a dull as its predecessors.
I will give Yates some credit; what it lacks in probable, dramatic story, it makes up for some stunning jungle visuals. Never mind that what action
The story is convoluted and almost slapdash in the way it is put together. Even the good parts are not good enough to muddle through the mess. The story starts as Tarzan (pretty boy Alexander Skarsgard) is asked to travel back into the Congo to help a trade agreement with Belgium’s King Leopold II, who seems to be systematically plundering the Congo. There is a back story that is told through flashbacks that are often confusing, it’s like an origin story told within a sequel and it just doesn’t work. Even the villains aren’t menacing with the
Skip the 3D version, it is not worth your extra hard earned shillings as a matter of fact, wait for this C- effort to show up with the rest of the B-Movies on Netflix in about a month. I think it’s time for filmmakers to realize that Tarzan is dead on the vine.